radio life

I have given up music momentarily in order to finish as much of "This American Life" archives (here) as I can before school. I don't remember it being this good when I was 14 or 15 in the back of my parents' car on the way to Chinese school though admittedly more of my attention was focused on making a semblance of effort on my homework without the parents noticing; usually this meant sitting behind the driver's seat. And so I can only recall episodes of "Wait Wait Don't Tell Me" because it required little concentration, "Car Talk" and "The Diana Rehm Show" because the hosts had very particular voices, and if we went shopping after school and came home late at night "A Praire Home Companion" because I could not find it funny no matter how hard I tried.

"This American Life" however is funny when it wants to be. And quite moving. A few small things that I like: Ira Glass' boyish voice, great editing for maximum impact and clarity on par with cable shows, and a liberal slant that does not get in the way of presenting a balanced report. During an interview with a group of netizens akin to Anonymous who scammed a Nigerian scam artist by sending him to the edge of Darfur and then laughed on air while reading his letters of desperation, Ira was great in controlling the situation (whereas I maybe would have started throwing things) while getting at the important point that they were as morally reprehensible as the original scammer.

The only downside are reporters whose voices I will refuse to listen to no matter how good the story content, especially this one British fellow who talks with a slow drone which turns positively obscene when he tries to be dramatic. Another perhaps superficial disadvantage is that a lot of its stories are rooted in current events making them rather obsolete or stale--ones on the financial crisis or america's extreme measures against terrorism--but I feel that these factors are only settings and the real focus is on the story, to tease out at the roots a rich interweaving of human interactions almost shakespearean in quality and depth. Interestingly this program has made me feel ashamed about how naive I was and still am in regards to the level of injustice and human suffering in America and yet also a little bit more love for what progress we have made as a nation. 

Additionally, they use "In the Mood for Love"s Angkor Wat Theme Song (here) as transitions for various stories. Bias made.

I've listed a few favorites from the past five years:




Arms Trader 2009 (here)
The U.S. government spent two years on a sting operation trapping an Indian man named Hemant Lakhani, whom they suspected of being an illegal arms dealer.
note: 58 minutes and one second of brilliant reporting.

Contents Unknown (here)
Stories of filling in the blank. A man finds himself in a train station in India, with no idea how he got there or who he is. His memory gone, he has no choice but to let other people—police, doctors, friends, family—create an identity for him.
note: all three of these stories are great.

Simulated Worlds (here)
Simulated worlds, Civil war reenactments, wax museums, simulated coal mines, fake ethnic restaurants, an ersatz Medieval castle and other re-created worlds that thrive all across America. 
note: somehow i feel japan could give america a run for its money, but the theories are interesting. the bit in this about a medieval scholar from uchicago visiting medieval times is the best.

What I Learned From TV (here)
Stories recorded during our 2007 live tour. Sarah Vowell, David Rakoff, Dan Savage, and other favorite contributors went on the road with us to New York, Boston, Minneapolis, Chicago, Seattle, and Los Angeles; and performed brand-new stories in front of sold-out audiences.

Who Do You Think You Are? (here)
This week we bring you stories of privilege and the lengths some will go to to maintain it. 
note: i really love the second act's interviews with people about their experiences during the depression. the last act is very humorous; "it's all about choices" should be a lawyer's hippocratic oath.

Very Tough Love (here)
A drug court program that we believe is run differently from every other drug court in the country, doing some things that are contrary to the very philosophy of drug court. The result? People with offenses that would get minimal or no sentences elsewhere sometimes end up in the system five to ten years.

The Psychopath Test (here)
Recently we heard about this test that could determine if someone was a psychopath. So, naturally, our staff decided to take it. This week we hear the results. Plus Jon Ronson asks the question: is this man a psychopath?
note: i like the second report on whether corporate leaders are psychopaths.

Right to Remain Silent (here)
Stories about people who have the right to remain silent... but choose not to exercise that right—including police officer Adrian Schoolcraft, who secretly recorded his supervisors telling officers to manipulate crime statistics and make illegal arrests. 
note: the second act is fascinating and kafka-esque, especially when the police strikes back.

Inside Job (here)
For seven months a team of investigative journalists from ProPublica looked into a story for us, the inside story of one company that made hundreds of millions of dollars for itself while worsening the financial crisis for the rest of us.

Habeas Schamabeas (here)
The right of habeas corpus has been a part of our country's legal tradition longer than we've actually been a country. It means that our government has to explain why it's holding a person in custody. But now, the War on Terror has nixed many of the rules we used to think of as fundamental. At Guantanamo Bay, our government initially claimed that prisoners should not be covered by habeas—or even by the Geneva Conventions—because they're the most fearsome enemies we have. But is that true? Is it a camp full of terrorists, or a camp full of our mistakes?

note: this report won the Peabody Award. i really enjoyed the interviews with former prisoners.


--------

From "This I Used to Believe" (here)

Jay Allison
So, I'm wondering you work in radio, and I work in radio. How come we haven't heard from you on what you believe? How come you haven't done an essay for "This I Believe"?

Ira Glass
Well, actually I mean it's funny. I think that I don't-- I say this and it's going to sound a little more dramatic than I mean it. But I'm not sure I believe anything, in that way, that would make for an essay.

Jay Allison
But did you ever, did you ever sit down-- or do you just sort of ask yourself rhetorically from time to time?

Ira Glass
I ask myself whenever I hear the series. I hear you on the radio and I think, how come I'm not on Jay's series? Like, how come I'm not doing This I Believe?

Jay Allison
Are you sure you're not just giving up too easily though?

Ira Glass
I don't know. I think I'm one of those people where like, I had a lot of really strong beliefs about stuff when I was a kid, and I like had a religious phase, and then I had a very strong, like, atheist phase and then I had a very political phase. And I was like politically correct for years. I mean the kind of politically correct where like, when I was in my 20s I went to Nicaragua and I called it Nikh-a-RAH-hua. And you know what I mean? Like, I was horrible. And--

Jay Allison
Did you call it Nikh-a-Rah-hua on the radio, too?

Ira Glass
Ah no. I knew better than that. At least I knew better than that. But you know I mean? Like, and then, just like, I got older and I saw that things seemed more complicated than the way that I'd believed them. And when I poll myself, I'm like, what do I believe in? Well I believe that listening to the radio in the car is the best place to listen to the radio. I've got that. But that doesn't seem like it's worthy of your series. I think it's true. I can defend it, but--.

Jay Allison
How about if something bad happened? Is there something you'd cling to?

Ira Glass
You mean in terms of a belief?

Jay Allison
Mm-hmm.

Ira Glass
I mean, I take comfort in the thought that when things seem really sad it's a comfort to me that well, everybody's going to go through this. Everybody's gone through this. And the problem is that, like, it's too much of a set of truisms to actually be good enough for your series.

Jay Allison
But your show is always looking for a conflict, and something to happen, and for something to change. I mean, maybe even this show is going to be about how something changes. So, possibly you're not interested in things that are static and enduring.

Ira Glass
No, I think that's true. It's funny like I think that's why I like This I Used to Believe. I'm much more attracted to that than to This I Believe because it just has the feeling of like, people are changing. And for me, drama is more interesting than ideas in a way. It's funny, I didn't even know I thought that until now I'm saying, that but I think it's true.

Jay Allison
Maybe you believe in that.

Ira Glass
And there's my essay. You are the master.

Jay Allison
I'm just an editor, man.

distance




-




-



uta barth tinna heiska andy denzler

some inspired by elephant magazine ( a sample here).

life and death

Then life looked back and around thoughtfully and said softly: "O Zarathustra, you are not faithful enough to me. You do not love me nearly as much as you say; I know you are thinking of leaving me soon. There is an old heavy, heavy growl-bell that growls at night all the way up to your cave; when you hear this bell strike the hour at midnight, then you think between one and twelve--you think, O Zarathustra, I know it, of how you want to leave me soon."

"Yes," I answered hesitantly, "but you also know--" and I whispered something in her ear, right through her tangled yellow foolish tresses.

You know that, O Zarathustra? Nobody knows that."

And we looked at each other and gazed on the green meadow over which the cool evening was running just then, and we wept together. But then life was dearer to me than all my wisdom ever was.

Thus spoke Zarathustra.

----Fredrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra



I work all day, and get half-drunk at night.
Waking at four to soundless dark, I stare.
In time the curtain-edges will grow light.
Till then I see what's really always there:
Unresting death, a whole day nearer now,
Making all thought impossible but how
And where and when I shall myself die.
Arid interrogation: yet the dread
Of dying, and being dead,
Flashes afresh to hold and horrify.
The mind blanks at the glare. Not in remorse
- The good not done, the love not given, time
Torn off unused - nor wretchedly because
An only life can take so long to climb
Clear of its wrong beginnings, and may never;
But at the total emptiness for ever,
The sure extinction that we travel to
And shall be lost in always. Not to be here,
Not to be anywhere,
And soon; nothing more terrible, nothing more true.

This is a special way of being afraid
No trick dispels. Religion used to try,
That vast, moth-eaten musical brocade
Created to pretend we never die,
And specious stuff that says No rational being
Can fear a thing it will not feel, not seeing
That this is what we fear - no sight, no sound,
No touch or taste or smell, nothing to think with,
Nothing to love or link with,
The anasthetic from which none come round.

And so it stays just on the edge of vision,
A small, unfocused blur, a standing chill
That slows each impulse down to indecision.
Most things may never happen: this one will,
And realisation of it rages out
In furnace-fear when we are caught without
People or drink. Courage is no good:
It means not scaring others. Being brave
Lets no one off the grave.
Death is no different whined at than withstood.

Slowly light strengthens, and the room takes shape.
It stands plain as a wardrobe, what we know,
Have always known, know that we can't escape,
Yet can't accept. One side will have to go.
Meanwhile telephones crouch, getting ready to ring
In locked-up offices, and all the uncaring
Intricate rented world begins to rouse.
The sky is white as clay, with no sun.
Work has to be done.
Postmen like doctors go from house to house.

----Phillip Larkin, Aubade

the glossys







fairly successful day that started with donating books to goodwill, checking out local bike shops, and buying a stack of magazines at borders for 40% off. still waiting a few weeks for the discount to reach the pristine philosophy section. the two short stories collection were a steal at $3 each. i am a bit skeptical about egger's "the best american nonrequired reading 2008", having viewed the series as a product of cultural a.d.d. from the pick i am most excited by the magazines all of which i have never read due to their rather high prices and my dislike of cafe reading.

here are the ones i picked:

Lapham's Quarterly Volume IV, Number 3: Food
Paris Review 197: William Gibson & Samuel R. Delany Interviews 
Clash 60: The Film Issue
Lula 12: Girl of My Dreams
Monocle Issues 45 Volume 5: What does it take to make a city both liveable and lively?

currently, the only two publications i read regularly are foreign policy and the new yorker. i'm thinking of adding one or two quarterly publications. i'm decided against clash and lula and wavering on paris review since i already have the new yorker. interestingly, the last three added to three other publication (the gentlewoman, fantastic man, and boat studio ) make six rather superficially inviting zines from great britain; what's in their water? i am mostly likely to subscribe to boat, which relocates to and writes regarding a different city every issue. and a bit because it has the least embarrassing name.

Boat Studio [site link] [review]
Clash [site link]
Fantastic Man [site link] [review]
The Gentlewoman [site link] [review]
Lapham's Quarterly [site link]
Lula [site link]
Monocle [site link]
Paris Review [site link]



Lapham's Quarterly  Review




"Published four times a year, each issue of Lapham’s Quarterly adopts and explores a single theme...A typical issue features an introductory Preamble from Editor Lewis H. Lapham; approximately 100 “Voices in Time” — that is, appropriately themed selections drawn from the annals and archives of the past — and newly commissioned commentary and criticism from today’s preeminent scholars and writers. Myriad photographs, paintings, charts, graphs, and maps round out each issue’s 224 pages."

I have two primary complaints about the content. The preamble promised a good mix of history, culture, and politics relating to food. Based on the open article's somewhat serious concluding slant on neo-Malthusianism, the obesity crisis, and current food production I was expecting more attempt to trace the origins of our growing food crisis both at home and abroad which were only partially satiated at the end by an article on America's pastoral nostalgia (which is why agricultural reform is so vexing--see the insidious and delusional ad campaign in DC's tunnels). Yet this section only warranted a passing few pages in a ~250 page ad-less magazine. There is a pretension to create a more informed public, and not putting aside the fun of reading about ancients feast rituals and Bourdain's meal of an endangered species (=__=), but shouldn't people also learn a little bit about themselves? For example that the cows we eat are feed on an unnatural diet of corn which would kill them if not for the abundance of antibiotics pumped into them, which means that our meat is unhealthier than ever, fattier and full of medicine that passes onto us and not to our benefit. I think there is a clear necessity on the topic of food to be vocal about these long-term problems: the battle over GMOs, the crisis in farm subsidies, the issue of obesity vs. malnutrition and its class dimensions or even on a more literary basis how we are what we eat and now in worse ways than ever.

At the same time I understand these are weighty issues which have been most effectively addressed in books (though "An Omnivore's Dilemma" managed to be literary, political, and interesting) and academic papers. but Lapham neatly side-stepped hard work in order to focus rather exclusively on a disconnected literary past. The two hundred or so pages in between are filled with short passages culled from myriad sources spanning the breadth of human history, from literature to court records to manner books to autobiography...there is an interest in establishing a long dialogue across cultures, but most of the time it reads as a western tale with a smatter of eastern flavor to appear comprehensive. I like the choices, especially since i've read half of them in high school or college--"To Praise a Mockingbird", "Things Fall Apart", "Oliver Twist", "Walden", "The Jungle", "A Modest Proposal", "Lives of Artists"...--so I get bored. Lapham clearly writes for a Western moneyed audience (who else can afford the cover price?) but it fails to become more than a rehash of the narrow narrative we have already ingested as kids. Perhaps I should not judge from a single issue since it was a 2011 finalist for the National Magazine Award. It is doubtlessly better than most magazines. I also admit that the pictures are gorgeous (rubber cover!), the format is comfortable, and I enjoy its lack of ads. But I am bothered by its relatively few new material and its extreme collage nature. Throughout my life I have had to continuously work against an inability to focus and I suppose I dislike my reading materials mirroring my lack.


Monocle Review




"Monocle is a global briefing covering international affairs, business, culture and design."

I enjoyed this magazine much more than Lampham's. The later is maybe like changing channels every five minutes on a TV dealing only in literary foods while the former a long documentary that weaves several dimensions (business, culture, design) into a loose focus on a large topic complete with interesting asides. Though it might be more of a montage, Monacle somehow feels more comfortable a read than Lampham's failed simplicity: narrow theme != depth. Granted there is a lot more money -- see the middle section of monocle monogramed wares, the blackberry insert booklet, and the patek philippe back cover (complete yuppie chow)-- thus more work put into Monocle: great long and short interviews, original research, and easy-on-the-eyes formatting and glossy photography sections.

I especially love the photos, favorites being the series on Monacle's own base called the Midori House (above). I'm also amused by its Japanese slant: a good half of "50 things to improve your life" has to do with Japanese living: Kentaro recipes, salarymen cotton crepe trousers, Maruni furnitures, Hakusan crockery. The first bit is personally interesting; roommates and god knows that I need to figure out other food to eat besides dumplings, tofu, and dried ramen.

05/50: A Clutch of Kentaro Recipes You Know by Heart
"For those dismayed by the fact that Japanese food is fare easier to consume than it is to create. Kentaro Kobayashi is a godsend. The chef has penned a raft of Japanese cookery books, which make the taste of rustling up a buttered yellowtail rice bowl or miso pork noodles seem effortless. His home cooking books also dispel the lingering myth that Japanese cuisine consists only of raw fish, rice, and conveyer belts, with each focusing on a range of everyday food types. With many released under the umbrella title "Easy Japanese Cooking", favorites including Bento Love, Donburi Mania, Noodle Comfort and Veggie Heaven."